Navigation Menu+


Categories of Construction Accidents

Posted by on 12:36 pm in Construction | 0 comments

Construction sites are inherently dangerous, which is why workers have all sorts of safety gear and practices to minimize their risk. However, not all construction sites observe safety protocols, and there are instances when the accident is due to other forces. People typically suffer serious injury in construction accidents, and in some cases, they are not even construction workers. According to the website of Habush Habush & Rottier S.C. ® the consequences of such injuries can be devastating on many levels.

Often, the only thing a victim can do is to claim for compensation. Four categories of construction accidents exist, classified based on the circumstances of the injury.

On the Job Injury

The one thing most workers can rely on is workers’ compensation. Because it is a no-fault system, no one has to prove negligence to make a claim. However, there are certain limitations. The worker sustained the injury while on the job, was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and may not file a personal injury lawsuit against a negligent employer. Workers’ compensation also tends to be less than what a worker can receive in a personal injury lawsuit.

Third Party Involvement

While workers’ compensation rules bar the injured worker from filing a personal injury claim against the direct employer, it does not prohibit filing a lawsuit against a third party, such as a truck driver or company that caused the accident. The worker can file a workers’ compensation claim and still file a personal injury lawsuit.

Non-Worker injuries

Sometimes, the injured party is a non-worker, such as a pedestrian or a motorist injured by falling objects or open manholes. In most instances, non-workers are prohibited from entering a construction site to minimize exposure to danger. However, according to the website of Hach Rose, this does not relieve the contractor from the duty to post adequate warning signs and take steps to keep non-workers safe.

After the Fact

Even when active construction is over, the site can still be a source of danger if the contractor, designer, or engineer was negligent. It could be shoddy workmanship, a too-low railing, or structural defects. In such cases, the injured party can file a lawsuit against the responsible third parties. Consult with a personal injury lawyer in your area to find out who these are.

Uses of Self Storage

Posted by on 3:42 pm in Storing Belongings | 0 comments

Most people think that self storage is only for people who have too much stuff. Space is a premium at home so it is true that many people use self storage units to keep the things they do not need but simply cannot sell, give, or throw away. However, there are other reasons why you might need self storage that will not make you a candidate for the television show “Hoarders.”


You could be moving. It is often necessary to keep your stuff in storage while you are moving from one place to another, especially if it is interstate. You can pack and send stuff you do not immediately need ahead of time so that you only need to worry about the essentials on moving day. You can also avoid the stress of tripping over boxes of non-essentials taking up space. You can take your time unpacking and arranging everything before you bring in the rest.


You may be out of town for an extended period. Long trips can become financially burdening. Your work may take you away from home for several months, but you do not want to keep paying rent or bring your stuff with you. You can put the contents of your home in storage until you come back. According to the website of Ben White Mini Storage, you can be sure that your stuff will be secure and in good condition by the time you are ready to get them back.


You may need to keep items secure until probate is over with. When someone dies, their property is often divided among family members according to a will or state inheritance guidelines. However, before the property is handed over to the rightful owner, it has to go through probate court. Many executors of an estate will transfer valuable things such as period furniture or valuable paintings into self storage to prevent anyone from getting them prematurely.

It Might Be better to Sell Minerals Rights

Posted by on 11:58 am in Mineral Rights | 0 comments

If you are a property owner in Texas, it is likely that people have approached you with offers to buy or lease your mineral rights. Depending on your location, you could be sitting on a gold mine – literally! It is more likely, though, that you have natural gas or oil deposits under your feet just waiting to come out, and that is just as good, if not better. However, you will not know one way or the other until you or someone else starts drilling. The question before you now is whether you should sell mineral rights or lease them.

The biggest problem with selling your mineral rights is that once the deal is done, you will have no further benefit from it. Once it passes out of your hands, you will have no claims on whatever happens to be there. If it happens to be the mother of all oil wells or natural gas, then you are out of any royalties or profit from it.

On the other hand, you do not have to worry about it anymore. You get a lump sum that you can use in any way you like, instead of having to wait for your royalty checks if you decide to lease it. You also do not have to think about whether your mineral rights will yield anything or not, because you no longer own it. If it turns out to be a dry one, it is no longer your problem. If you had leased it out, the small amount you got for leasing it out is all you will ever get from your mineral rights. You might kick yourself for not selling for a good price when you had the chance.

It can be a ticklish decision. The best way out of this dilemma is to sell mineral rights at the right price. You are probably not in the mining business, so there is no profit in holding on to your rights. On the other hand, you also probably have no idea how to sell them and for how much. It would be advisable to let a reputable mineral rights auction house to handle the transaction for you. They have the knowledge and contacts to put you together with serious buyers who will give you a fair price.

Vaginal Mesh Revision Surgery Complications

Posted by on 7:26 pm in Product Defects | 0 comments

It is now widely known that the use of transvaginal mesh for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or urinary stress incontinence is inadvisable. POP and stress incontinence are common disorders that come with aging in women when the muscles around the uterus, bladder, and bowels become weak and impinge on the vagina. The mesh is supposed to prevent this impingement and to support these weakened muscles.

The polypropylene mesh is based on a highly effective product called a surgical mesh, used mainly to correct hernias. The problem lies in the structure of the vagina, which is in constant motion and never completely sterile. This can cause the mesh to shift and tear into nearby organs and increasing the risk of infection. These in turn can lead to serious health complications, according to the website of law firm Williams Kherkher. Many of the women who have been implanted with the vaginal mesh have had to get revision surgery to remove it.

Revision surgery for vaginal mesh is more complicated than the original surgery for implanting it because the mesh is supposed to be permanent. When the mesh is attached incorrectly, or moves out of position, the surgeon has to find and remove bits and pieces of the mesh from the surrounding tissue and internal organs. The process is time consuming and painful, and it often takes three or more surgeries to remove most of it. Often, complete removal of the original mesh may not be possible.

Even when complete removal is accomplished, the patient may still suffer from the effects of injury to their organs, tissue, and nerves. Some patients suffer from bleeding, chronic pain, and sexual dysfunction. In addition, their original complaint – POP or stress incontinence — still has to be addressed, which means another procedure. It is no wonder that 87% of the women that had transvaginal mesh implanted say that they would not have agreed to the procedure if they knew the risks they were taking.

If you sustained seriously injury from your transvaginal mesh, you may be eligible for compensation. Find an experienced vaginal mesh lawyer in your area for a consultation about your case.

It Should Not Have Happened at All

Posted by on 2:51 pm in Trucking Accidents | 0 comments

The semi that caused the death of a 32-year-old motorist should not have been on the road at all.

On March 26, 2015, a tractor trailer owned by Lares Trucking struck the underside of a bride on Interstate 35, near mile marker 286 in Texas. The bridge was under construction, and the impact caused two steel beams to come crashing down onto the highway. One beam hit the pickup driven by Clarke Davis of Arlington, killing him, and injuring three others in various vehicles.

There was some confusion over why the truck was on I-35 when it was too tall to pass safely under that particular bridge. As pointed out on the website of Zavodnick, Zavodnick & Lasky, truck drivers and companies have a duty of care to other vehicle owners when they are on the road, and that includes knowing when it is safe to travel on a certain road. An investigation by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) revealed that the semi in question was not even supposed to be on the road because it did not have an oversize permit. These are permits issued by the TxDOT to overweight and oversize trucks, which should detour around roads like I-35, which have low-lying bridges or other obstacles. The driver of the truck that caused the accident did not know the height of the truck.

It would seem clear to any Texas semi truck accident lawyer that there is quite a bit of negligence in action here. At the head of it is truck owner Lares Trucking, which already has several citations for various violations. While the truck driver had no history of reckless driving, there is always a first time. The failure to get an oversize permit, which would have detailed the height of the truck before getting on any highway, was a direct cause of the accident. If the driver had known the height of the truck, he would have known that the bridge was too low to be traversed safely.

If you have been injured in some way from the negligence of a trucking company or driver, you need representation. Consult with a truck accident lawyer in your area for more information.